Sunday, May 22, 2011
Man shot at South Side BBQ
Police are looking for a gunman who opened fire at a South Side barbeque.
The shooting happened around 9 p.m. on the 8400 block of South Muskegon Avenue in the South Chicago neighborhood.
A tall black man wearing all black clothing, shot at several people in a backyard, striking one man in the shoulder.
An unidentified woman took the injured man to Trinity Hospital, 2320 East 93rd Street. His condition is unknown.
A motive for the shooting is under investigation.
13 comments:
NOTICE: Do not post SPAM, links to other websites, website addresses, phone numbers, or email addresses.
Unless a person is a direct or indirect subject of a news article, or a public figure, do not post other people's first and last names in the forum.
**** COMMENTS THAT CONTAIN RACIST, VULGAR, OR VIOLENT REMARKS, WILL BE DELETED! ****
Furthermore, with the exception of the comments left by the blog’s administrators or editor, the opinions expressed in the comments section are the sole responsibility of the author, and do not reflect the views and opinions of the editor or the administrators of Chicago News Report.
Under federal law, we are not responsible for third party comments.
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Ghetto thugs don't need a motive. They are evil hateful, have no morals or conscience and don't have a clue what right from wrong is. They are truly the parasites of society.
ReplyDeleteAlso, shooting people is often a part of gang initiation.
"Man shot at South Side BBQ"
ReplyDeleteHA! Summer has officially started, and I'm not talking calendar wise.
Unless it's at the Promontory Point in Hyde Park, I wouldn't be caught dead at a "South Side BBQ", let alone in a crime-ridden residential area like South Chicago. Pretty scary situation it seems. The suspect intended for someone to die, unless he was just on his normal nightly "killing" stroll through the neighborhood.
T., this crack generation is a mess! An absolute mess!
ReplyDeleteThe more time I spend blogging, the more I am convinced that certain segments of society should be forcibly sterilized. Otherwise, their sickening stupidity and irreverence for human life, will be passed on for generations.
Meanwhile, race/poverty pimps like Jesse Jackson make their living exploiting the race card while simultaneously ignoring black on black atrocities. And anytime a black person speaks out on this issue, they are called a sell-out! What a bunch of twisted sisters!
This may sound harsh, but sometimes I wish that the government would just pass a law that requires teen girls/women living in areas like Englewood, Austin, Roseland etc.., to be NEUTERED!! If that happened, then 15 years from now, we may be seeing some changes.
ReplyDeleteJesse Jackson is a complete JOKE! He is part of the problem in Chicago violence, NOT the solution! Oh, and I found it quite hilarious that he got booed in 2008 when they showed him on the big screen at Obama's presidential victory party in Grant Park.
Skokie, if forced sterilizations aren't legally feasible, we can always stop giving free money to welfare mamas. Why are we rewarding women for popping out babies they can't take care of?
ReplyDeleteUnder the current system, the more babies you have, the bigger your government check. It's a system that is designed to fail.
When the welfare babies reach a certain age, the government cuts them off. So what do they do? They rob and assault the people who actually work for a living.
Our government, particularly the democratic party, is responsible for breeding generations of lazy parasites.
The women aren't having babies by themselves. If women are going to be sterilized, then the same should happen to men too. Fair is fair. :)
ReplyDeleteNon-democratic voting is one way to curtail welfare. :)
How many Homosexuals vote Democratic? "Most" homosexual vote totals are usually high.
Exactly, my dear 'ole tax dollars, what a shame! Nah I say the girls/women there should be neutered because they're the ones thats letting multiple low-lifes and felons all up in them. It's all about saving the future. If they would've passed such law in '94 and '95, then I'm pretty sure the murder/gang violence rate now in 2011 would be significantly lower.
ReplyDeleteRudy said: "The women aren't having babies by themselves."
ReplyDeleteThat's true, but they are the ones who get stuck with the children; and we are the ones who get stuck with their hospital bills, childcare costs, etc.
However, I am not opposed to sterilizing certain segments of the male population, too. :-)
Timothy Fitz said: "However, I am not opposed to sterilizing certain segments of the male population, too".
ReplyDeleteYeah, like the very hardworking, considerate, decent, tax-paying male citizens that actually earned their living legally, can do without the sterilization. But all the other males who encourages the "crack baby mama" saga and "ghetto unprotected sex"... I would not oppose to it.
Some of the males are rapists too. :(
ReplyDeleteThese comments are so damn racist you people should be ashamed of yourselves! You sound like a bunch of Nazis!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
ReplyDelete@Anonymous May 24, 2011 12:29 AM-
ReplyDeleteThe truth hurts, I understand. But please enlighten me on the "racist" part in the comments. I don't see it.
Anonymous, May 24, 2011, 12:29 AM,
ReplyDeleteBlack on Black Crime is racist, because it further advances the Klu Klux Klan's goals. :(